It wasn't until I read the Finkelstein quote
"to participate in society we cultivate a public persona, a manner of
being in the world that works to sustain our engagement with others," that
I questioned myself, as well as those around me. Have we all created a persona?
Does that mean we're all pretending? I've come to realize, however, that, in
some way, we all have to "construct" an identity.
From the beginning, we've all had to choose; good
or bad? conform or rebel? It was through these choices that we chose who we
wanted to become; we constructed an identity. Finkelstein said, “we are
coherent, self-determining beings who can make life whatever we want- and the
opposite, we are deficient beings who need to compensate for a lack of
character, sentiment and skill, which we can do with the easy purchase of a new
car, cosmetic dentistry or a total makeover.” On one hand, we subconsciously choose
who we will be and what we present, whilst on the other hand the construction
is forced. If one realizes that who they are isn’t socially acceptable or
celebrated, they consciously choose to fabricate their image, becoming who
society says they should be. In both ways, an identity is formed that the
person now must live and identify with.
However,
the theory of "the Spectacle," from Guy Debord's Society of the
spectacle, has shown that that forced construction can be persuaded or
influenced. For many, the images constructed come from what is advertised. Debord
said, "Considered in its own terms, the spectacle is an affirmation of appearances
and an identification of all human social life with appearances.” In other
words, it has everything to do with show. It’s so evident today; everyone is occupied
with their outward appearances or how the world perceives them, whether by the
car they drive, who designed their clothing, the types of phone they own, etc. Many
of that comes from what is being televised as cool, or what will instantly grant
you happiness, etc.” Whether it’s through social media pages, billboards, or celebrity
figures, we are constantly being bombarded with images or lifestyles that are
seemingly perfect or how life should be.
This concept, along with that of power, race,
identity, and gaze are illustrated in many artworks. Many such examples were
showcased in the Montclair Art museum’s ‘Constructing identity in America’
exhibit. One artwork that amplified the concept of race and identify would have
to be ‘Matar Mbaye’ by Kehinde Wiley, done in 2007. If one is to construct an
identity, then they should be proud of it. This painting celebrates this young
man’s identity; it celebrates his blackness. The African American male is shown
form his shoulders up in what seems to be an everyday attire, surrounded by
birds and leaves. His gaze is quite compelling, as he stares into the viewers’
eyes, and it isn’t by coincidence. According to an article by Bell Hooks, the
oppositional gaze, “the politics of slavery, of racialized power relations,
were such that slaves were denied their right to gaze.” This simple power was
taken from black people for a long time and Kehinde is making a statement with
the gaze in this painting, as if to say, “here I am. Acknowledge me.” The birds
also seem to be symbolic, possibly of freedom; the freedom to unapologetically
be who he is and possibly even to gaze.
Another painting that stood out and shed light on
the issues of identity and race was that by Lorna Simpson, called Coiffure, done
in 1991.The artwork consists of three black and white photographs, all seen
from behind, one a woman’s hair, one of a braided style by itself, and one of the
insides of a mask. It also featured rectangular board at the bottom with words,
giving instructions on how to braid. The choice of subjects in this matter is symbolic,
especially for a woman of African descent. In the book ‘Ways of seeing’, John
Berger said, “The photographer’s way of seeing is reflected in his choice of
subject.” I believe that Simpson wanted to address an issue that is relatable
among black women, their hair, as well as school non-black women about a black
woman’s hair. I believe she wanted to show the diversity she saw in it, that you
can go from natural to braids. Not only that but that it isn’t something to
hide, hence the mask. Berger continues, “Yet, although every image embodies a
way of seeing, our perception or appreciation of an image depends also upon our
way of seeing.” The angle of these images is also quite significant. Simpson,
maybe, showed us the subjects from behind because she didn’t want us to judge
it based on face value.
Thirdly, one that was not only aesthetically
pleasing, but also tackled the issue of power, class, was by Ben Jones, Juxtapositions
#11, done in 1989.The art piece consists of four panels: one addressing the
issue with power, a portrait of the artist’s face, a triangle which may be to
represent the hierarchy, and an abstract piece. Although all four panels are symbolic,
I would just like to focus on the two panels that addressed the idea of power. One
panel has the words, “You need power, what kind?” and lists some powers below; spiritual,
sexual, economic, etc. This aligns with the idea of constructing an idea and
the power you choose to possess. The triangle, which represents class, may be blank,
so the viewer could construct their own hierarchy in the order they wish
because as Berger says, ‘when we ‘see’ a landscape, we situate ourselves in it.”
In that same way, I believed the artist wanted people to situate themselves
into his art.
The fourth art piece, ‘Rock. Well: radiant, pop,
champ’ done by Fahamu Pecou in 2010, addressed the issue of identity. A black
male sits on a stool looking in a mirror as he paints himself. Above his canvas
are pictures of Ali, Warhol, and Basquiat. Finkelstein addressed the importance
of cultural influence in his book when he said, “Popular culture is not simply
diversionary: it circulates ideas and brings complex questions to our
attention.” I believe one of those questions would be, “who do I want to be
like?” The artist may have included those important figures not because they
were important to him but because they have influenced so many artists’ and
their identities.
Lastly, is the artwork I believed address the issue
of the spectacle, as well as identity; Untitled (seeing through you) by Barbara
Kruger, done in 2004-05. The art work featured the face of a woman gazing up with
the words ‘seeing through you’ plastered across her face in bold green letters.
I believe that Kruger could be addressing the issue of a false identity, or
more so, an identity centered around a lie. Debord said, “In a world that has
really been turned upside down, the true is a moment of the false.” In the
moment one realizes that they’re being largely influenced by certain mediums,
advertisements, and images, is the moment they realize how much who they are might
not be who they really are. Instead, it was because of ‘the spectacle’ that they
really constructed that identity.
No comments:
Post a Comment